Foundational Theories

Three things I learned are:

1) In a week 12 to 15 percent of school-aged children who have urgent needs for social and emotional support are not getting help (Perry, Winne & Woolfolk, 2016, p. 215). This is not surprising as I am aware of one school division that now limits students visits to their school counsellor. Students are only allowed to meet with the school counsellor eight times regardless of their situation.

2) Community and mental health services often don’t reach the students who are at the highest risk (Perry, Winne & Woolfolk, 2016, p. 215). There is a continued increase in mental health issues amongst young people while resources for these students are limited, and in some cases, difficult to access.

3) An important factor in supporting resilience is having connected relationships (Perry, Winne & Woolfolk, 2016, p. 216).  Students that have a strong support system and connected relationships (peers, friends, teachers, parents, other significant adults, etc.) are likely to be more resilient and better equipped to face challenges.

 

Two Connections I made are:

1) Resilient student traits are directly connected to all aspects of development (physical, personal, social and cognitive). These developmental areas start at birth and need to be fostered immediately to ensure that the child becomes the most resilient person/student he/she can be and therefore able to cope with classroom and life’s pressures. Resiliency goes far beyond the classroom.

2) In order for students to experience growth they must be provided opportunities for learning that they do not find boring but also ones that they do not find too difficult where they could become frustrated and give up.  This is what the text refers to as the place of the “match”.   Beginning with situations where the students will need to reach and are challenged to gain understanding but that reaching this understanding is attainable. Assisted learning and guided participation allows students to scaffold their current knowledge to the next level.

One (or more) question I still have is:

How does a teacher meet the needs of all the students in the classroom when each student’s level of resiliency is different as is their place of “match”?  How does the teacher identify the place of “match” for the students and what are some strategies teachers can use to promote resiliency in their classrooms?

For example:  In a class of 30 students, five students have much lower resiliency than their classmates or that the overall students’ place of “match” vary greatly?

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s